Dirac Home
Navigation item arrowHome
Navigation item arrowIntroduction
Navigation item arrowFAQ
Navigation item arrowDocumentation
Navigation item arrowLicenses
Navigation item arrowGetting involved
Navigation item arrowContact us
Navigation item arrowSourceforge
Navigation item arrowProject page
Navigation item arrowDownload
Navigation item arrowBrowse CVS
Navigation item arrowForums

SourceForge.net Logo
Valid XHTML 1.1!

Frequently asked questions

Last revised by Michael Prior-Jones, February 2005.

Who are you guys?

How did Dirac begin?

Why is it called Dirac?

Why are you releasing Dirac Open Source?

Where can I get Dirac?

What are the license conditions?

Are you going to charge for Dirac?

Do the BBC have patents in Dirac?

Do you infringe any patents?

What will you do if you infringe patents?

Is the BBC going to stream video using Dirac?

Are you going to broadcast TV using Dirac?

What about Ogg Theora?

How does it work?

Why did you choose the techniques that you're using?

What's with your picture file format?

How do I play compressed video?

How do I code video?

How can I help?

What needs doing?

When will Dirac be ready?

Up arrowtop

Horizontal rule

Who are you guys?

The BBC Dirac team is led by Tim Borer, Principal R&D Engineer in the BBC Research and Development Department. The main algorithm developer is Thomas Davies, Senior R&D Engineer, who devised the Dirac algorithm. The software is managed by Anu Suraparaju, Senior R&D Engineer, and Andrew Kennedy, Software Engineer. Michael Prior-Jones is a Graduate Engineer who's attached to the team until October 2005. 

Up arrowtop

How did Dirac begin?

BBC R&D has always been involved in video coding research as it's central to what the BBC does. Thomas began experimenting with compression techniques in about 2001, and developed various prototypes of coding tools. In January 2003 he had a rough research system in place which seemed to perform well. Since then he's been working to translate the software into something that could be the basis of a working codec, and to streamline the design. This involved rewriting the codec entirely in C++ to exploit the flexibility and modularity of the language.

Up arrowtop

Why is it called Dirac?

Dirac is named after the British physicist (of Swiss extraction) Paul Dirac, who was one of the great figures in modern physics. We've seen some good explanations on the 'net, suggesting that we chose the name because the Dirac delta function is fundamental to signal processing and that Dirac's work underpins wavelets. Sorry, but the stories aren't true. We thought of hundreds of names, most of them awful, some of them good, and most of the good ones had been used already. Tim suggested Dirac. It sounded good. It stuck. It was going to be called Camel, so maybe we had a lucky escape.

You can find out more about Paul Dirac here.

Up arrowtop

Why are you releasing Dirac Open Source?

The BBC has always advocated open standards, and has tried to use them where possible. So far, streaming has been dominated by proprietary systems and existing licensing regimes for standards-based systems have not been as attractive as they might be for large-scale broadcasting, particularly for Public Service broadcasters.

Up arrowtop

Where can I get Dirac?

You can download the latest version from the Sourceforge project page. You can also look at the developing code on the CVS there.

Up arrowtop

What are the license conditions?

Dirac is released under the Mozilla triple license (MPL). This is an Open Source license that allows both free and commercial use of the software. It also allows for relicensing under the GPL or the LGPL.

Up arrowtop

Are you going to charge for Dirac?

No. The terms of the MPL mean that as far as the BBC is concerned, there will be no charges or royalties for the Dirac software.

Up arrowtop

Do the BBC have patents in Dirac?

Yes. We have patent applications in train for some of the techniques involved in Dirac, and others that we intend to put into Dirac in the future. There has been some FUD about this, so we'll be clear: this does not affect the Open Source status of Dirac, nor does it affect its royalty-free status. The conditions of the MPL mean that we're licensing these patents for use within the Dirac software for free.

Up arrowtop

Do you infringe any patents?

The short answer is that we don't know for certain, but we don't think so. We haven't employed armies of lawyers to trawl through the tens of thousands of video compression techniques. That's not the way to invent a successful algorithm. Instead we've tried to use techniques of long standing in novel ways. Where we think we're novel, we're in the process of getting patent protection ourselves, which will invalidate others' claims of priority. There are some areas that are more heavily patented than others. Arithmetic coding is one such, even though the technique itself has been around for 25 years. We're keeping an eye on the situation, and we'll adopt alternative techniques if we have to.

Up arrowtop

What will you do if you infringe any patents?

Code round them, first and foremost. There are many alternative techniques to each of the technologies used within Dirac. Dirac is relatively modular (which is one reason why it's a conventional hybrid codec rather than, say, 3D wavelets) so removing or adding tools should be possible until it goes Beta and the bitstream and decoder functionality are fixed. But we also need to see where in the world potentially problematic patents apply, and how important they are.

Up arrowtop

Is the BBC going to stream video using Dirac?

The software is not quite ready for that yet - we need real-time decoding, integration with players, a bitstream spec and a transport stream format. So this will probably have to wait until Dirac is closer to beta, although it might be possible to set up something experimental sooner.

Up arrowtop

Are you going to broadcast TV using Dirac?

Broadcasting or multicasting over the web is likely to develop over the next few years, and the technology we use for this is likely to be the same as for standard streaming. There is no likelihood at all of replacing our existing Digital TV infrastructure, based on European DVB standards and using MPEG-2, with anything new - the installed base of millions of customers is too large.

Up arrowtop

What about Ogg Theora?

Theora is coming on very nicely, and has an impressive, well-defined spec.We're not quite so advanced yet, but we already have much better compression performance. We think you can't have too many free codecs, and that the Open Source community also needs to continue to develop codecs with increasingly better performance. Theora has helped create a pool of Open Source compression experts, which is of benefit to everyone in the field.

We intend to pack the Dirac elementary stream into MXF, which has lots of useful features. That doesn't preclude it packing into Ogg (or Matroska, or anything else ) as well, and it's probably a good idea to have a variety of packing formats. For this the elementary stream needs to be very well defined.

Up arrowtop

How does it work?

See the algorithm documentation

Up arrowtop

Why did you choose the techniques that you're using?

We chose wavelets for a number of reasons. They perform very well in still image compression, and can be said to be state of the art there. They also provide a degree of scalability, so a codec based on wavelets can perform well across a range of video standards. By scalability we don't mean embedded bitstreams or the ability to extract lower-resolution video from higher-resolution bitstreams - Dirac doesn't do this as it's very complex - only the flexibility to apply the same tools to a range of resolutions, perhaps with different parameters. Wavelet coding is also a well-studied and well-understood field.

Overlapped block motion compensation is used to reduce blockiness and ease the job of the wavelet transform in coding motion compensated differences. The wavelet transform may not be the best tool to do this, and we'd welcome other contributions, but it does have the benefit of simplicity in that the tools for all frame types are the same. Dirac supports more or less any block sizes for motion compensation and this again helps in scaling the algorithms as larger blocks can be used for higher resolution pictures and smaller ones for low resolution pictures.

Up arrowtop

What's with your picture file format?

You must have an old version of the codec. Dirac now just uses raw planar YUV, and there's no need to create a header anymore. We also have patches for ffmpeg and transfode, so you can use any of the formats they support.We've also got some tools for converting formats to and from the raw format, and there's advice on using these in the users README in the distribution.

Up arrowtop

How do I play compressed video?

We have a DirectShow filter which you can download, and a patch for MPlayer.

Up arrowtop

How do I code video?

You can use the encoder directly, using raw video in planar YUV format. Or you can download and install the patches for ffmpeg or transcode and use those.

Up arrowtop

How can I help?

By telling people about Dirac. By contributing to the code. See getting involved or contact us to find out more.

Up arrowtop

What needs doing?

There's still a lot to do. The spec needs a lot of work and the code and the spec need to converge. We need optimisation work for the encoder and decoder - the encoder in particular is still very slow. We also need to integrate tools like global motion, and optimise other tools. Another thing we lack is a buffer model and constant bit-rate encoding.

For a full(er) list, see the TODO list.

Up arrowtop

When will Dirac be ready?

We hope to get to beta by the end of 2005. This means fixing the bitstream spec and getting the code to conform to it.

Up arrowtop